Why Do We Cling To Books?

Okay, I don’t know what Rachelle has planned for Part 3, but her analogy relating Eastman Kodak’s demise to the current state of the book publishing industry may be the most well-packaged point of view I’ve read on the subject in years. This is a re-post of my comments on her site.

QUESTIONS POPPING IN MY HEAD:

As a writer, why the hell do I even want to formally pursue publishing?

If readers don’t care about “books”, why should I?

Why even trust e-books as some new endpoint? Why stop there?

Is there a better, and more profitable, way to reach an audience than books?

I’d like to make a living — in the age of free, what are people actually willing to pay for?

You say [EDIT: Rachelle says] this is a business of storytelling. Is it? Are you sure it isn’t the business of laughter inducement? Tear-jerking? Pulse-raising? Button-pushing? Thought provocation? Seriously, does anyone really care if Harry kills Voldemort? Or do we only care about how WE will feel if/when it happens?

I write kids’ poetry. How many better ways can I think of to sell and distribute poems in a low-attention, instant consumption world than in a static collection that takes years to write and publish? Probably dozens! Hundreds!

Why is “publishing” the end all be all of a writer’s existence? I don’t need a book. I need readers. I don’t even need “readers”. I need people. To read, sure, but to listen, watch, play, push, print, touch, feel, tear it in half, tell a friend, tweet it, retweet it, re-write it, do WHATEVER THEY WANT TO DO with it.

The book is now the most limited form imaginable.

Why do we cling to it?

Like it? Share it!



Like me? Subscribe to TKT!